justin = {
main feed
,
music
,
code
= {
cockos
,
reaper
,
wdl
,
ninjam
,
jsfx
,
more
}
,
askjf
,
pubkey
};
Ask Justin Frankel
No reasonable question unanswered since 2009!
Suggested topics: programming, music, sleep, coffee, etc.
Note: please do not ask questions about REAPER features, bugs or scheduling, use the
forums
instead.
Name:
Ask:
Human (enter yes):
[
back to index
] | [
unreplied
] | [
replied
] | [
recent comments
] | [
all
]
Question:
Does the WDL need a precaution measure to check when a constructor fails to instantiate? I haven't seen that myself in our codebase happen even once but it will hurt if it occurs. How about REAPER's codebase which I assume it's big and complex enough, how you deal with such an inconvenience?
Asked by gio (94.66.28.x) on June 7 2013, 8:49am
Reply on June 7 2013, 5:14pm:
Yeah, the whole new-failing-throws-exception thing bothers me too. :/ REAPER mostly just tries to keep new/delete allocations small for this reason (if small allocations fail, bad things inevitably will happen), but larger buffers are error-checked (and the user is warned).
Comment:
Your Name:
-- Site Owner's Name:
(for human-verification) Comment:
[
back to index
] | [
unreplied
] | [
replied
] | [
recent comments
] | [
all
]
Copyright 2025 Justin Frankel
.
|
RSS