justin = { main feed , music , code , askjf , pubkey };
Ask Justin Frankel
No reasonable question unanswered since 2009!

Suggested topics: programming, music, sleep, coffee, etc.

Note: please do not ask questions about REAPER features, bugs or scheduling, use the forums instead.

Name: Ask: Human (enter yes):
[back to index] | [unreplied] | [replied] | [recent comments] | [all]
Question: Re: constructor. how about std::nothrow in header -- is it beneficial or to put it better does it make sense with what we already have? On the other hand living in danger feels extremely good, manly stuff, etc.
Asked by gio (94.66.28.x) on June 8 2013, 12:31am
Reply on June 9 2013, 6:58pm:
    it looks like std::nothrow would have to be used with every call to new, unless one could override it per-class. Probably wouldn't want to do it per-class, anyway, but instead any time you call new you'd add it and check the return value...
Comment:
    Your Name:   -- Site Owner's Name:  (for human-verification)

    Comment:
[back to index] | [unreplied] | [replied] | [recent comments] | [all]
Copyright 2025 Justin Frankel. | RSS