justin = {
main feed
,
music
= {
decanted youth
,
yes, exactly, yes!
,
not vampires
,
full archive
}
,
code
= {
cockos
,
reaper
,
wdl
,
ninjam
,
jsfx
,
more
}
,
askjf
,
pubkey
};
Ask Justin Frankel
No reasonable question unanswered since 2009!
Suggested topics: programming, music, sleep, coffee, etc.
Note: please do not ask questions about REAPER features, bugs or scheduling, use the
forums
instead.
Name:
Ask:
Human (enter yes):
[
back to index
] | [
unreplied
] | [
replied
] | [
recent comments
] | [
all
]
Question:
Portable installation is so good. Why you guys still give us the normal installation? Isn't it better we all to switch to portable installation? Any disadvantage portable installation has over normal installation? I recently tested portable installation and found it great. Now I am switching my main REAPER into portable one.
Asked by Abhi (182.68.65.x) on April 25 2020, 8:24am
Reply on April 25 2020, 9:26pm:
Most people prefer to have all of the system integration stuff, it seems. The only real things I can think of that require installation, though, are ReWire and ReaRoute.
Comments:
Posted by Mespotine (2.247.250.x) on April 26 2020, 8:11pm:
On Mac, plugins who are components cannot be put into a portable installation yet, so they must be installed on every system, who use them. So even if you use only portable versions of Reaper, components-effects cannot be exchanged that easy. We have that problem with our Ultraschall-Soundboard-plugin, for example.
Posted by Mespotine (2.247.250.x) on April 26 2020, 8:11pm:
@Justin shall I open a bugreport about that?
Comment:
Your Name:
-- Site Owner's Name:
(for human-verification) Comment:
[
back to index
] | [
unreplied
] | [
replied
] | [
recent comments
] | [
all
]
Copyright 2024 Justin Frankel
.
|
RSS