Ask Justin Frankel

justin = { main feed , music , code , askjf , pubkey };

Ask Justin Frankel
No reasonable question unanswered since 2009!

Suggested topics: programming, music, sleep, coffee, etc.

Note: please do not ask questions about REAPER features, bugs or scheduling, use the forums instead.

[back to index] | [unreplied] | [replied] | [recent comments] | [all]

Question: The volume envelope is currently processed along with inserts in the necessary anticipative render-ahead buffer. This is bad for skilled volume fader users. Can this be changed , so we do not need to arm a track to have lag-less(as much as possible) volume envelope recording ?
Asked by Airon (91.64.134.x) on November 18 2022, 11:24am
Reply on November 18 2022, 1:00pm:

Can reduce the antfx size, or record arm the track

Comments:

Posted by Airon (91.64.134.x) on November 18 2022, 1:39pm:
I can't arm tracks when I'm mixing a film. Having selected tracks auto-arm will just gang up the volume, so I'm hoping for something better. At the very least volume+pan automation recording has to be treated like you treat midi and audio. I was hoping you could come up with a solution that perhaps activates when a track is in anything but trim-read or read mode. Please think it over, because any fader jockeys(like myself) are having a bad time. Discuss in the forum ?

Posted by Justin on November 18 2022, 7:31pm:
The forum is a better place to discuss this for sure. Anyone else I would've scolded for bringing it up here to begin with ;)

Posted by Airon (91.64.134.x) on November 19 2022, 10:30am:
Mim , fakemaxwell and myself are full time mixers it appears. We are discussing this here: forum.cockos.com/showthread.php?t=258048. Any thread is fine though.

Comment:

    Your Name:   -- Site Owner's Name:  (for human-verification)

    Comment:

[back to index] | [unreplied] | [replied] | [recent comments] | [all]