justin = {
main feed
,
music
,
code
= {
cockos
,
reaper
,
wdl
,
ninjam
,
jsfx
,
more
}
,
askjf
,
pubkey
};
Ask Justin Frankel
No reasonable question unanswered since 2009!
Suggested topics: programming, music, sleep, coffee, etc.
Note: please do not ask questions about REAPER features, bugs or scheduling, use the
forums
instead.
Name:
Ask:
Human (enter yes):
[
back to index
] | [
unreplied
] | [
replied
] | [
recent comments
] | [
all
]
Question:
Few years ago, a known company released an audio monitoring plugin that people were excited about, I too was. However, it's smallest size was still too big for me. Though a novice in jsfx coding, I decided to create same plugin in jsfx with the assistance of AI. I made it. The jsfx plugin doesn't have a fancier gui but it gave same results as all other vst plugins that does the same thing. Is it really that easy to code plugins in vst format, or jsfx is quite more easy because I made it in less than 3 mins?
Asked by Deee (102.176.65.x) on April 11 2025, 10:31pm
Reply on April 11 2025, 10:48pm:
nice! JSFX is easier/faster but writing VSTs is relatively straightforward too, just a lot more boilerplate/busywork/etc and then a slower compile/test process.
Comments:
Posted by Deee (102.176.65.x) on April 12 2025, 7:45am:
I see. Jsfx is great then. Pls what about Clap compared to vst?
Posted by
Justin
on April 12 2025, 2:01pm:
Pretty similar, though CLAP has less C++ crud, and more cleanly defined interfaces, which I appreciate.
Posted by Deee (102.176.65.x) on April 12 2025, 2:42pm:
Ok, thanks.
Comment:
Your Name:
-- Site Owner's Name:
(for human-verification) Comment:
[
back to index
] | [
unreplied
] | [
replied
] | [
recent comments
] | [
all
]
Copyright 2025 Justin Frankel
.
|
RSS